Abstract

This article analyses selected challenges of remote education, focusing on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is divided into a theoretical part, synthetically explaining the key challenges related to remote education: social interactions, students' motivation and engagement, and an empirical part, presenting the results of a survey conducted on 1828 students at the Cracow University of Economics.

The empirical research enabled analysis of the impact of selected distance education factors on the level of perceived learning outcomes by students, with a particular focus on social interactions (both between teachers and students, and among students), student motivation, and engagement in remote learning environments. The data was collected through a survey distributed in 2020 and 2022, using the Computer Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) technique via Google Forms. The results indicate moderate improvements in social interaction and motivation over time, with a slight decrease in the perceived effectiveness of remote learning.

The literature review and empirical study reveal changes in the quality, motivation, and engagement of interaction, emphasising the need to adjust teaching strategies in the areas considered to increase the effectiveness of remote education. This study enriches the current literature by addressing gaps and providing suggestions for directions of future research, additionally providing practical recommendations for teachers and educational institutions to improve the efficacy of remote learning.

Keywords: remote education, social interaction, motivation, engagement, challenges in remote education

References

• Abbasnejad, B., Soltani, S., & Wong, P. (2023). A systematic review of online learning and teaching strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for the construction management sector. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment [Vol. ahead-of-print]. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-08-2022-0174
• Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
• Ahshan, R. (2021). A framework of implementing strategies for active student engagement in remote/online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Science, 11(9), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090483
• Amon, B. T. (2021). E-Studio: The use of information and communication technologies in the development of drawing competences in different educational environments. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2007578. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.2007578
• Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
• Bergdahl, N. (2022). Engagement and disengagement in online learning. Computers and Education, 188, 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104561
• Carmona-Halty, M. A., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2019). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9S): Factorial validity, reliability, and measurement invariance in a chilean sample of undergraduate university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017
• Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
• Deng, Q. (2022). A research on online education behavior and strategy in university. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767925
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
• Eccles, J., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In: J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). W. H. Freeman. http://education-webfiles.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/arp/garp/articles/ecclesparsons83b.pdf
• Estrada, F. J. R., Ruiz-Ramírez, J. A., George-Reyes, C. E., & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2022). Evaluation of a virtual campus adapted to web-based virtual reality spaces: Assessments of teachers and students. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.918125
• Flick, U. (2020). Introducing research methodology: A beginner's guide to doing a research project (3th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
• George, G., Singa, E. C., Lavie D., & Scott B. A. (2016). Big data and data science methods for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1493-1507. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4005
• Hopp, M. D. S., Händel, M., Bedenlier, S., Glaeser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., & Ziegler, A. (2022). The structure of social networks and its link to higher education students' socio-emotional loneliness during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733867
• Ibrahim, Y., & Hidayat-Ur-Rehman, I. (2021). COVID-19 crisis and the continuous use of virtual classes. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8, 117-129. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.04.014
• Karakose, T., Ozdemir, T. Y., Papadakis, S., Yirci, R., Ozkayran, S. E., & Polat, H. (2022). Investigating the relationships between COVID19 quality of life, loneliness, happiness, and Internet addiction among K-12 teachers and school administrators - A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal Environmental Research Public Health, 19(3), 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031052
• Kreamer, L. M. Albritton, B. H., Tonidandel, S., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2023). The use and misuse of organizational research methods 'Best practice' articles. Organizational Research Methods, 26(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211060706
• Krzyżak, J., & Walas-Trębacz, J. (2021). Subjective factors determining the development of online self-study skills during the global COVID-19 pandemic - from the perspective of students' experiences. Communications of International Proceedings, 6, 3845321. https://ibimapublishing.com/p-articles/COVID38EDU/2021/3845321/3845321.pdf5321.pdf
• Lamanauskas, V., & Makarskaite-Petkevičiene, R. (2021). Distance lectures in university studies: Advantages, disadvantages, improvement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep309. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10887
• Lisady, F., Wong, F., & Sany (2023). Student autonomy, self-efficacy on engagement, and student engagement and service quality on student satisfaction. In: A. Kusuma Wardano (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st UPY International Conference on Education and Social Science (UPINCESS 2022) (pp. 326-338). ASSEHR, 695. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-39-8_31
• Maini, R., Sehgal, S., & Agrawal, G. (2021). Todays' digital natives: An exploratory study on students' engagement and satisfaction towards virtual classes amid COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38, 454-472. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2021-0055
• Martin, A. J. (2023). University students' motivation and engagement during the covid-19 pandemic: the roles of lockdown, isolation, and remote and hybrid learning. Australian Journal of Education, 67(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441231179791
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In: D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). Routledge.
• Ober, J., & Kochmańska, A. (2022). Remote learning in higher education: Evidence from Poland. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114479
• Pappas, C. (2019, November 29). Top Learning Management System (LMS) Statistics For 2020 You Need to Know. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/top-learning-management-system-lms-statistics-for-2020-infographic
• Pons, R. M., Sharan, Y., Serrano, J. M., Lomeli, C., & Buchs, C. (2013). Training of non-university level teachers in cooperative learning methods. Psychology, 4(3A), 291-301, https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.43A043
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
• Saliba, L. (2023). Learning Leverage for Online Distance Education (D.E.): A new key performance indicator proposition for higher education management; Case study of AUL University - Lebanon. PM World Journal, 12(8). https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/pmwj132-Aug2023-Saliba-Learning-Leverage-for-Online-Distance-Education.pdf
• Sitnicki, M. W., Horbas, I., Derkach, O., & Rozbeiko, K. (2023). The impact of digitalization on the development of e-learning. e-mentor, 2(99), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.15219/em99.1606
• Sułkowski, Ł., Lenart-Gansiniec, R., & Kolasińska-Morawska, K. (red.) (2021). Metody badań ilościowych w zarządzaniu. Wydawnictwo Społecznej Akademii Nauk.
• Svatos, J., Holub, J., Fischer, J., & Sobotka, J. (2022). Online teaching of practical classes under the Covid-19 restrictions. Measurement: Sensors, 22, 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100378
• Thompson, Z., Yoon, H., & Booth, P. (2023). Dispersed assessment: A novel approach to enhancing student engagement during and beyond Covid-19. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100811
• Tsang, J. T. Y., So, M. K. P., Chong, A. C. Y., Lam, B. S. Y., & Chu, A. M. Y. (2021). Higher education during the pandemic: The predictive factors of learning effectiveness in COVID-19 online learning. Education Sciences, 11(8), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080446
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
• Xhaferi, B., & Xhaferi, G. (2020). Online learning benefits and challenges during the COVID 19 - pandemic-students' perspective from SEEU. SEEU Review, 15(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2020-0006
• Yan, E. M. Y. (2021). Embracing digital teaching and learning: innovation upon COVID-19 in higher education. In: S. X. Zhao, J. H. Wong, C. Lowe, E., Monaco, & J. Corbett, J. (Eds.), COVID-19 pandemic, crisis responses and the changing world (pp. 299-327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2430-8_19
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016